Hello Ward!

13 Sep 04 19:28, you wrote to me:

 >> But the selection of the IC was already defined in policy, that was
 >> the method used, your redefinition was not needed nor is it
 >> enforceable..

 WD> The IC is 100% at liberty to interprete policy, you know the section
 WD> where it sits. No-where is it explained how he/she can do it or which
 WD> portions are excluded of it. It simply is an IC-prerogative.

You were no longer IC, the election was over.

 WD> The only person able to make interpretations is the IC. In the case of
 WD> the IC-(s)election he has executed that privilege and the result is
 WD> that Janis' motion was overruled by an about 90% majority.

Actually you arent the IC anymore..

 WD> Don't like it? Tough but that is how things work.

You arent the IC anymore, dont like it, tough, but thats how things work..

Ward, you were fired, get over it.

==
Ross
ICQ: 5305939
Food For thought:
If you arent shining John Kerry's shoes, you are a liar.Kerry Partisans
... Drama is life with the dull bits cut out.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-30512