Hello Ward!

13 Sep 04 16:14, you wrote to me:

 >> Except that the IC isnt selected by the RC's and certainly not by
 >> any majority of the nodelist.

 WD> You hinted yourself at "the rest of us know better" ... you didn't
 WD> mention "selection of the IC" but now you drag that into
the equation.

 WD> Since the ruling as per P4-so-and-so the IC has interpreted that
 WD> "majority" in the case of IC-selection is linked to zone-size.

But the selection of the IC was already defined in policy, that was the
method used, your redefinition was not needed nor is it enforceable..

Pertinent Sections of Policy!

--
The International Coordinator is selected by the Zone Coordinators.
--

No ambiguity there, you were both selected to replace Satti and you
yourself were replaced with this method.

--
In cases not specifically covered by this document, the International Coordi-
nator may issue specific interpretations or extensions to this policy.  The
Zone Coordinator Council may reverse such rulings by a majority vote.
--

Ah this is what you said you used..

Yeah after the votes were in, you got desparate and claimed this..

At that point it was too late, you should have pulled the rabbit out of
your hat sooner, even though according to above, any rabbit could be
outvoted and its not unreasonable to assume it was since the ZCC used
existing methods to elect Malcolm.


Dont like it, tough!

 WD> You may pluck your nose as often as you want but that most likely
 WD> defines that the IC is selected by a majority of the nodelist and not
 WD> by a Junta led by someone in Windsor, NY supported by at least one
 WD> fake-ZC.

You are not the IC, dont like it, tough!


==
Ross
ICQ: 5305939
Food For thought:
John Kerry Is Not Sargeant York!
... Politics is just like show business. You have a hell of an opening, you coast f
---