DT> Oh, and if you want to debate LEGACY code, I will state that OWL
DT> is more OOP and much more encapsulated than MFC...  But that is
DT> debating History, is it not?
No way.  What's really history is my situation.  My company has been
developing GUI apps. since Windows version 0.9.  They have written a
very extensive library which predates MFC, OWL, OCL and just about
anything else you can think of (except maybe the original Windows SDK).
 This library is close to MFC ... but not quite the same.  A switch in
libraries would not only mean rewriting 4,000 modules but also (and
probably most important) it would be a grand blow to some of the
largest egos you've ever seen.
 * KWQ/2 1.2i * 
--- TMail v1.31.5
---------------