From: Mike '/m' 

On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:43:31 -0400, "Geo"  wrote:

>"Mike '/m'"  wrote in message
>news:8hi8k1tlrpqp5gos1ksvgnch0kkaa45opi{at}4ax.com...
>
>> >I don't know how it works, I do know that if you can delete a
spam so can
>> >Norton.
>>
>> There's the rub.  Does Norton delete it after Outlook has it in the
>> inbox, or does Norton block it from getting to Outlook.  I think the
>> latter, i.e.
>
>I've seen Norton remove it after it's in the inbox, I believe the virus
>scanner works prior to outlook getting it but I think the spam filter is a
>post receive operation.

OK, but keep in mind the message disappeared on the outbound.

One of the reasons I am so skeptical here is that since upgrading from
Office '97 to my current version of Office, I've noticed a notable drop in
the quality of the Office software, especially Outlook.  Too many little
quirks, mis-designs and subtlely odd behavior have been popping up since
the upgrade.

While Norton may be in the room with Outlook, I'm unconvinced that it was
Norton that lost the message.

 /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5