TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: science
to: MILES MAXTED
from: PETER COGGON
date: 2007-10-15 12:34:00
subject: Re: referendum

Hello Miles and David...

 -=> Quoting Miles Maxted to David Williams <=-
 MM> G'afternoon David,
 
 DW> Elections, especially provincial ones, never produce a very high
 DW> turnout here. 60% would be regarded as good. Yesterday's election got
 DW> 53%, and nobody is complaining.

 MM> I guess 47% are prepared to let the others decide...

  They weren't as they are only second now in a record set in 1925
when those whom didn't vote was 55%  leaving 45% to vote....
 
 DW> I'm not so sure. Maybe the political climate is different here. Parties
 DW> have always (at least in recent decades) been the driving forces in
 DW> politics. Almost all votes in Parliament are ones in which each member
 DW> has to toe his party's line. When one party gets an absolute majority
 DW> of seats, as happened yesterday, it can do pretty much what it likes,
 DW> even though only a minority of the population voted for it (42%
 DW> yesterday). Only when another election is approaching does the
 DW> government have to take much notice of public opinion.

 MM> ...and one group and its persuasion drive the nation.

Perhaps they were sending a message to Mr. Tory and the PCs ???
 
 DW> Occasionally, we get "minority government" situations,
where no party
 DW> has an overall majority. Actually, that situation exists in the Federal
 DW> Parliament right now. So, to get anything done, the parties have to
 DW> co-operate, making compromises that take differing viewpoints into
 DW> consideration. Usually, that turns out to be a good thing. Minority
 DW> governments tend to be a bit unstable, but they govern better than
 DW> majority ones.

 MM> Coalitions tend to avoid extremes - if that is 'governing better'. 
 MM> In my view, thorny issues go further back with coalitions than 
 MM> with majority governments...
 
  I like minority due to issues being really debated and attended and
bills on the table getting properly addresssed to everyone's idea
so a consenus can be reached....like as with the minority of CCF's
Tommy Douglas that got Health Care passed as a private member's bill.

Look at what majority governments have done with Health Care in CANADA.
 
 DW> But the "first past the post" system has the effect of
giving parties
 DW> numbers of seats that greatly exaggerate the numbers of votes. The four
 DW> parties here got 42, 32, 17, and 8 percent of the votes yesterday.
 DW> (Independents and tiny parties picked up a percent or two.) But the
 DW> leading party (the Liberals) got about two-thirds of all the seats.
 DW>
 DW> There's an empirical rule called the Cube Rule that predicts pretty
 DW> well how many seats the parties get. The numbers of seats are
 DW> proportional to the *cubes* of the numbers of votes. If you calculate
 DW> the numbers of seats this rule predicts with the voting numbers above,
 DW> they are pretty accurate.

 MM> It works very well over NZ's voting history, too - but I've never 
 MM> ever managed to get any of our political scientists to give it 
 MM> credence.
 
 DW> But is this good democracy? Wouldn't it be better to have something
 DW> that makes the numbers of seats directly proportional to the numbers of
 DW> votes. Here, this would almost always produce a minority government,
 DW> but that's okay with me and most other people.

 MM> The key to this view is the presence of political parties. I'd put 
 MM> it that pp's are hazardous to the concept of democracy and should 
 MM> be banned - as are cartels in any other activity.

 MM> And if you wanted to have the `popular vote' relate to seat 
 MM> precentages,  then any process that ends when a candidate gets 50% 
 MM> or more of the electorate vote will do it.

 MM> There's no need to give parties the mandate to install their hacks 
 MM> and favourites to equate the two percentages as MMP does.

 MM> And that `popular vote' is a real nonsense,  anyway;  it's 
 MM> obtained by the simple addition of all electorate outcomes,  
 MM> regardless of how many candidates and/or parties stand in each 
 MM> individual electorate, sizes, geography, soci-economics and the 
 MM> like. 
 
 DW> Oh well... The point is academic now, and probably for the foreseeable
 DW> future.

 MM> You're probably safe up there;  it seems that the furtherest bits 
 MM> of civilisation like NZ attract or generate fervent nutters who 
 MM> get into such ridiculous arrangements....  this MMP government 
 MM> won't like a Fijian goalkeeper into NZ to play an international 
 MM> soccer, so FIFA has cancelled the match - and probably NZ as a 
 MM> future venue for any other international....

 MM> Suddenly, we're out of both soccer and rugby worlds and looking 
 MM> succeed at lacrosse (sorry, Lacrossians) or tiddleywinks or 
 MM> summat...   :-(

 MM> Miles.

 MM> +--------------------Miles-Maxted-------------------+
 MM> | 116 Sunrise Avenue, North Shore City, New Zealand |
 MM> | Ph/Fx/As: ++64-9-478-3138   Mob: ++64-21-296-3891 |
 MM> +---------------------------------------------------+
 MM> 
 MM> ___ MultiMail/Win32 v0.47

 MM> -!- Maximus/2 3.01
 MM>  ! Origin: === Maxie BBS.  Ak, NZ +64 9 444-0989 === (3:772/1)

Interesting the comments on MMP ... Not really covered here...but
I joined the 63% that voted NO.   Main reason....I didn't like
the party hacks being placed in the seats they proposed in MMP
and as a taxpayer...I oppose paying some party yesman to do
the same as what is going on with party platforms and in the
house where they vote the party line and not the voters opinions.

No ... unfortunately we only get a vote at election time...and
not when real issues are there...only the party whips telling
or ordering them to vote the party line.
 
While a PC  got voted in up here ...thats ok...I know her as
I know very well the other candidates as close friends too.
What amazed me is the new size of the riddings to places where
these people really never meet the people of the community.

Do any of  you gentlemen read the CANCHAT echo?   I am mostly
there yapping about this with others too.

ttfn

Peter   {at} Lake Simcoe,Ontario,CANADA


... * WCE 2.1G1/2419 * YOU can help wipe out COBOL in our lifetime.
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30 [NR]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Doc's Place BBS Fido Since 1991 docsplace.tzo.com (1:123/140)
SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/250 300 400 34/999 90/1 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 222/2
SEEN-BY: 226/0 229/4000 236/150 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1411 1418
SEEN-BY: 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 393/68 633/260 262 267 285 712/848 800/432
SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/105 200 2800/18 2905/0
@PATH: 123/140 500 261/38 633/260 267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.