From: "Geo" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C5D0EA.9D38D7C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

George's claim was that the exploits would allow pretty much any windows =
box on the internet to be rooted by eeye, you are the one trying to = limit
this to your specific computer where you run mostly just the = newest
versions of whatever MS gives you.

anyone can go to windows update and see if they require the patches, how =
many folks here do you think will find that they do?

Geo.
  "Rich"  wrote in message news:434fded9{at}w3.nls.net...
     George's false claim was in regard to eeye's reported claims.  I =
don't have a vulnerable copy of that installed anywhere and only one or =
two of my machines have any copy.

     The simple point is that George was wrong.  He'd look less a fool =
if he admitted it.

  Rich

    "Mike N."  wrote in message =
news:oc3vk1997vntoam2oqlc14e837ejsvu3u6{at}4ax.com...
    On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:19:50 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:

    >   I don't have MDT2DD.DLL installed.=20

       But what about the subject of the advisory MSDDS.DLL?  But I see =
that it
    only concerns old versions of this DLL that almost no one would be =
running.

------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C5D0EA.9D38D7C0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








George's claim was that the exploits =
would allow=20
pretty much any windows box on the internet to be rooted by eeye, you = are the=20
one trying to limit this to your specific computer where you run mostly = just the=20
newest versions of whatever MS gives you.
 
anyone can go to windows
update and see =
if they=20
require the patches, how many folks here do you think will find that = they=20
do?
 
Geo.

  "Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:434fded9{at}w3.nls.net...
    
George's false claim was =
in regard=20
  to eeye's reported claims.  I don't have a vulnerable copy of =
that=20
  installed anywhere and only one or two of my machines have any=20
  copy.
   
     The
simple point is that =
George was=20
  wrong.  He'd look less a fool if he admitted it.
   
  Rich
   
  
    "Mike N." <mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>">mailto:mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net">mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>
=
wrote in=20
    message news:oc3vk1997vn=
toam2oqlc14e837ejsvu3u6{at}4ax.com...On=20
    Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:19:50 -0700, "Rich" <{at}>=20
    wrote:>   I don't have
MDT2DD.DLL installed.=20
       But what about the subject of
the advisory=20
    MSDDS.DLL?  But I see that itonly concerns old versions of =
this DLL=20
    that almost no one would be =
running.

------=_NextPart_000_0058_01C5D0EA.9D38D7C0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5