TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: Geo
from: Rich
date: 2005-10-16 09:38:20
subject: Re: Revisiting george`s false claims

From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01CF_01C5D235.59050CD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   You still haven't been mature and honest enough to admit you are =
wrong.

Rich

  "Geo"  wrote in message
news:435276b3{at}w3.nls.net...
  Don't be obtuse, I'm talking about MS rating vulns in their products =
and using multiple exploits to root a machine. If an MS vuln requires = you
go to a hostile website for it to be able to exploit you, sending = you to
that website is trivial via other exploits like using a pdf file = included
in an email. PDF files are not generally thought of as a = threat, people
email them to each other all the time.

  As for my eeye claim, there are still 5 remote code execution exploits =
listed on their "unpublished" page that have not been patched, of
the = ones announced this month, there were 4, one of which is media player
9 = exploit that will affect even xpsp2. It's trivial to make a pdf file =
play a movie, it's a feature, the pdf can even contain the trojaned avi =
file. (ohhh, perhaps I should mention that to eeye..)

  Geo.
    "Rich"  wrote in message news:43504a2e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
       Since when does Microsoft rate vulnerabilites in adobe acrobat =
reader or whatever you are using when you claim to run a program from a =
PDF file?  Or is this just you trying to change the topic again.

       To remind you of your earlier claim from =
news://news.barkto.com/42d308d2$1{at}w3.nls.net you wrote "eeye could
wipe = out 95% of the world's computers any time they want".  You even
had the = nerve to claim that not only are you right but that the burden is
on = everyone else to prove you wrong.  Are you now mature enough to admit
= you are wrong?

    Rich

      "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:43502a3b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
      I'm talking about Microsofts own rating of the eeye exploits. As =
for your family not running any systems vulnerable to the latest = exploits
MS announced, when did they switch to linux?

      Geo.

        "Rich"  wrote in message news:434f3273{at}w3.nls.net...
           Are you claiming that eeye is behind this as well or is this =
just you trying to change the topic?

        Rich

          "Geo"  wrote in message =
news:434f1a9e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
          and they never open pdf files either I bet.. (remember how =
they can be used
          to send you off to any website I want?)

          Geo. (did I mention I found a way to open calc.exe from a =
pdf?)

          "Mike N."  wrote in message
          news:n47tk11hjj25pbrch5msih91oo493d81eh{at}4ax.com...
          > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:50:16 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:
          >
          > >   My machines were not at risk to any of these eeye =
reported issues.
          > >I don't think any of my family or friends are at risk to =
any of these
          either.
          >
          >   And just how were your family and friends protected from =
this one?  Does
          > everyone you know surf everywhere with all active content =
disabled?
          >
          > =
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-052.mspx
          >


------=_NextPart_000_01CF_01C5D235.59050CD0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   You still
haven't been =
mature and=20
honest enough to admit you are wrong.
 
Rich
 
"Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net> wrote=20 in message news:435276b3{at}w3.nls.net... Don't be obtuse, I'm talking about MS = rating=20 vulns in their products and using multiple exploits to root a machine. = If an=20 MS vuln requires you go to a hostile website for it to be able to = exploit you,=20 sending you to that website is trivial via other exploits like using a = pdf=20 file included in an email. PDF files are not generally thought of as a = threat,=20 people email them to each other all the time. As for my eeye claim, there are still = 5 remote=20 code execution exploits listed on their "unpublished" page that have = not been=20 patched, of the ones announced this month, there were 4, one of which = is media=20 player 9 exploit that will affect even xpsp2. It's trivial to make a = pdf file=20 play a movie, it's a feature, the pdf can even contain the trojaned = avi file.=20 (ohhh, perhaps I should mention that to eeye..) Geo.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:43504a2e$1{at}w3.nls.net... Since when does = Microsoft rate=20 vulnerabilites in adobe acrobat reader or whatever you are using = when you=20 claim to run a program from a PDF file? Or is this just you = trying to=20 change the topic again. To remind you of your = earlier=20 claim from news://news.barkto.com/42d308d2$1{at}w3.nls.net">news://news.barkto.= com/42d308d2$1{at}w3.nls.net=20 you wrote "eeye could wipe out 95% of the world's computers any time = they=20 want". You even had the nerve to claim that not only are you = right but=20 that the burden is on everyone else to prove you wrong. Are = you now=20 mature enough to admit you are wrong? Rich
"Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>=20">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>=20 wrote in message news:43502a3b$1{at}w3.nls.net... I'm talking about Microsofts own rating of the eeye exploits. = As for=20 your family not running any systems vulnerable to the latest = exploits MS=20 announced, when did they switch to linux?Geo.
"Rich" <{at}> wrote in message news:434f3273{at}w3.nls.net... Are you claiming = that eeye is=20 behind this as well or is this just you trying to change the=20 topic? Rich "Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net> wrote = in message=20 news:434f1a9e$1{at}w3.nls.net...and=20 they never open pdf files either I bet.. (remember how they = can be=20 usedto send you off to any website I want?)Geo. = (did I=20 mention I found a way to open calc.exe from a = pdf?)"Mike N."=20 <mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>=20">mailto:mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net">mike{at}u-spam-u-die.net>=20 wrote in messagenews:n47tk11hjj2= 5pbrch5msih91oo493d81eh{at}4ax.com...>=20 On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:50:16 -0700, "Rich" <{at}>=20 wrote:>> > My machines were not = at risk=20 to any of these eeye reported issues.> >I don't = think any of=20 my family or friends are at risk to any of=20 theseeither.>> And just how were = your=20 family and friends protected from this one? Does> = everyone you know surf everywhere with all active content=20 disabled?>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-052.mspx"= >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-052.mspx;= > ------=_NextPart_000_01CF_01C5D235.59050CD0-- --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.