JD>> Can you tell, from the FTSC docs, if there is a standard
 JD>> regarding the inclusion of the fully qualified path and
 JD>> filename.ext in the outbound .pkt?

 ml> AIR, there is not... it was originally written in a "just get the 
 ml> file to the destination with the message" type manner... it wasn't 
 ml> until the network got a lot larger and busier that some of these 
 ml> details and needs arose...

Thanks.
I'm hoping somebody else actually goes and has a look for it.  As I read
it, it amounted to just what you say here.    It written with a certain
degree of lawyer-ese though, and a second opinion can't hurt.  

[...]

 ml> i know that feeling... i used to live in the FTSC docs when i was 
 ml> actively coding... now i'm on the FTSC and still read them but that's 
 ml> about it, these days...

Aha!
So *you're* one of 'em, eh?   


Seriously though, can you get us an official answer, from the FTSC?
 in plain English though....  :)


Thanks


                                        .....Joe

--- Msged/2 TE 05