I am a sociologist by profession. Let me try to explain to where the child
abuse hysteria train is headed.
There are a finite number of abused children and child abusers.
Psychiatrists, who probably have the most reliable data base, estimate the
real child abuse rate to be in the 1-3% rage. A resent survey of children
turned up 10%. These are far from the 100% rate of sexual abuse claimed by
some "experts." Under normal circumstance, when a finite criminal problem is
identified, the police will allocate sufficient man power to eliminate or
reduce the problem by investigating, arresting and prosecuting the
perpetrators. Thiss was not done in the case of child abuse. Several entire
bureaucracies were established whose continued existence depend solely on the
continued existence of child abuse. When the police resolve the problem,
manpower is reallocated. This is not possible with child abuse bureaucrats.
They would be out of work. In fact there is not cut-off mechanism in
existence. If it were determined that all the child abusers had been caught
and were in prison, the law currently requires that these people would have
to catch more child abusers tomorrow or their funding would stop.
This reality is one of the factors providing support and recruitment for the
militia movement.
Based on figures obtained from the child abuse agency here in Arkansas, it
appears that as many as 1/3 of all Arkansas families have been investigated
for suspected child abuse. By the Agnecies own figures 70% were false. This
leaves unresolved the actual status of the remaining difference between their
30% "founded" and the best estimates of child abuse in the 1-10%. range.
Falsely accusing families of child abuse as a matter of policy erodes
confidence in the legitimacy of government. Observations in other counties
indicate the revolts succeed or fail based, not on their actual numbers so
much as on the general support they have among the non-combatant population.
At the current rate of growth, I estimate that the percent of Arkansas
families investigated for child abuse will be in the 45-50% range at the time
of the next presidential ellection. What is going to happen as the total
number of families investigated and falsely accused of child abuse climes
above 50% and keeps going. Remember, there is nothing in place that will
stop this special interest "investigation."
The last component is what happens to individuals falsely convicted and sent
to prison for child abuse. Individuals sent to prison for child abuse have
the lowest status among the prison population. In one instance, an idividual
so confined, was beaten and forced to eliminate is bodily waste in his bed.
He was then forced to sleep in it. This was related to me by the inmate who
did it, not the victim. Some of you may think this is totally justified
treatment, but not all of these people are guilty. Put your self in this
persons place and consider what you would want to do when your sentence was
up and you were released, if you were innocent. If someone can physically
survive such savage treatment for 30-45 years, they are not going to be nice
people. Really, what would you want to do if you were falsely convicted of
child abuse and treated in this manner. In 1993, it was estimated that 13
social workers had been killed. What is the death rate going to be among the
psycholoigsts and social workers who lied on the witness stand and helped
send these people to prison.
--- GEcho 1.11+
---------------
* Origin: Conway PC Users Group BBS 501-329-7227 (1:399/4)
|