PP> To be exact, it is not the best at processor specific optimizing, but
 PP> to tell everything, the Photon optimizer for Pentiums (made by Intel)
 PP> included with Borland C++ produces bad code under a few
 PP> circumstance... ;-) It is more apt at generic optimizations, like
 PP> using a single constant for multiple constant symbols and so on...
 Yeah, I would definatly take general optimization and better portability 
 then a few less clock cycles, etc that no one would notice the difference 
 anyway and be stuck on one platform.
--- Telegard v3.02/mL
---------------