Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 331967890; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 05:40:21 -0800
Received: from 213.232.0.6 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2002121808421468703 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:42:14 GMT
Received: from mail.ada.com.tr (root{at}pop3.ada.com.tr [195.112.155.162])
 by mailmx.ada.net.tr (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id gBIFnQg05076
 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:49:26 +0200
Received: from isdn04173.ada.net.tr (isdn04173.ada.net.tr [195.112.156.173])
 by mail.ada.com.tr (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA08543
 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 16:54:58 +0200
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 15:47:22 +0200
From: Ayse Saray 
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
Reply-To: Ayse Saray 
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: 
To: "karen.wattie{at}fanciful.org" 
Subject: Re: Old softy
In-Reply-To: 
References: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi karen,

kwfo> I am frequently told, on PhotoSig, that my pictures are rather
"soft".
kwfo> They say this as if it is a bad thing.  I have been told on several
kwfo> occasions (not on PhotoSig) that I have my own "style". 
I've never quite
kwfo> known what that is, but perhaps this softness is just my style.  Comments
kwfo> anyone?

very recently, i have signed up to photosig to search the photos of a
friend of mine. (bulent burgac) i met the same critics for his or
some others' photos. i had (still have) the same problems with my
nude watercolors or drawings.
expect from the very famous general rules, these are all upto the
photographer or artist him/herself i guess.
i like yours and its your own way. just kick them off!


--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5