>  I've got a Mopar crazy youngster who keeps me up on all that stuff. 
You mean all that GM exposure and he's a Mopar man? =-)
> He's the
> guy who told me about the conversion.  I think he mentioned the parts
> had to be there because of the IROC thing back then.
Now that would make sense.
 On the topic of front drivers, RWD racers, those "Lets compare the car you
drive to its racing brother" Tya... as if there where any similarities left.
Even when the car you drove was still a RWD version of the racer, the darn
thing was day/night different enough to hardly warrent the glossy,
absolutely trivial things they always like to point out as being similar.
Other than a quick muttering that the racer is rear wheel drive, and the
engine is a big ole' v-8, you'd think the two where identical if you had to
base your judgement on these "Lets compare.." stories.
>  AB> Thats what I figured.  What was the GM product that Don Yenko had a
>  AB> hand in in the early 80's?
> 
> No idea.  Whatever it was, it didn't have performance as a theme did it?
> It would have been mere window dressing on anything they produced then.
Oh, it was definatly performance themed. It certainly didn't do the name
justice compared to previous creations.  I'll see what I can find out on it.
Alex.
 | AmiQWK 2.7 - S/N 0261 |
... A woman has the curves that can set a lot of things straight.
--- OLMS 2.60p.a1+ [EPMBP73M]
---------------