Tobias Ernst (2:2476/418) wrote to All at 11:34 on 05 Jan 1999:

 TE> So I think that if on your system the patched Timed is more slow
 TE> than the unpatched one, there must be another reason for it. I
 TE> suspect it is some sort of interaction between the interrupt
 TE> vectors I have used and the "operating system" from Redmond ...

 TE> Those persons that observed a *visible* performance impact, could
 TE> you please report what hardware, what operating system and what
 TE> version of Timed (DOS, /386, /2) you are using.

Tobias, I'm not about to uninstall my patched timEd to reinstall an
unpatched one as I have not noticed any performance difference between the
two.  For the record, I run the /386 version in a DOS box under Win98.

Take care,

Steven Horn (shorn{at}yknet.yk.ca)
Moderator CAN_SYSLAW
Co-Moderator, ALASKA_CHAT 
--- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+