> Hello Janis.

Hi Robert :)

> 14 Sep 04 10:57, you wrote to Ward Dossche:

> JK|> I believe people here are talking about "power" as
_you_ erroneously
> JK|> perceive it Ward, not as we perceive it (Robert's reference to 'real
> JK|> or not'). That is what I was agreeing with in my reply to Robert.

> JK|> While it's true you really can't 'do' anything (such as retake the
> JK|> position of IC which is why I think we should just put you in our
> JK|> collective TWIT FILTERS) when you did have the position of IC, you
> JK|> attempted to flaunt what power you _thought_ you had such as:

> JK|> 1 - Attempting to remove a node who registered a domain name you
> JK|> wanted (The IC and a ZC have no such authority under policy 4)

> JK|> 2 - Refusing to acknowledge a decision by the majority of ZCs in a
> JK|> policy
> JK|>     complaint
> JK|>    (The IC has no such authority under policy 4)

> JK|> 3 - Redefining sections of policy which clearly cannont be changed, so
> JK|> that you
> JK|>     could never be removed as IC - and at a time after you'd been
> JK|> removed as IC
> JK|>    (The IC has no such authority under policy 4)

> JK|> 4 - Refusing to acknowledge a vote by a majority of the  ZCC to
> JK|> replace you as
> JK|>     IC

> JK|> 5 - Threatening to change the decision made by the ZCC in the Witt/Van
> JK|> der
> JK|>     Vlist case.
> JK|>    (The IC has no such authority under policy 4)


> JK|> I'm sure if I dredge through enet.sysop I can come up with at least
> JK|> two lies you posted there in order to influence sysops and RCs.
> JK|> Again.. there was nothing you could do there but you were intent on
> JK|> maintaining your position as IC and needed to convince your audience
> JK|> without allowing anyone to respond to your lies  (Yes, even Ron read
> JK|> your lies about him, and was sickened by them).

> JK|> So, it's true, you do not have any "power" - that
doesn't mean you
> JK|> acknowledge it :)

> JK|> Take a break, huh?

> Indeed!

:)

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5