* * * This message was from Dennis \(Icarus\) to rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.m * * *
         * * * and has been forwarded to you by Lord Time * * *         
            -----------------------------------------------             

{at}MSGID: 
{at}REPLY:
 >>On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:06:14 -0400, Carl wrote
> (in article ):
>
> >
> >
> > Josh Hill wrote:
> >>
> >> The point is that one might have said the same thing about Monica. The
> >> press made a big brouhaha about that one and the family discord that
> >> ensued, and said nothing whatsoever about Bush's spat.
> >
> > First, as I've said before... I couldn't care less about Lewinsky.
> >
> > Still, I think that having an affair in the Oval Office with an intern
> > is substantially different than having a spat with your spouse (if
> > that's even true, I don't know). <<
>
> Yes, but what brought on the spat?  You could argue that what went on
between
> President and Mrs. Clinton about Lewinsky was just a marital spat, too.
The
> only difference is that whatever George and Laura are (were) fighting
about
> hasn't been made public yet.  And incidentally, insider speculation about
why
> Laura moved out is because of a purported affair between George and
> Condoleeza Rice, who famously mistakenly referred to the Pres as her
> "husb---".  How does the religious right feel about a man
who can't keep
the
> sanctity of his marriage vows, I wonder?

I'd imagine the same way they felt back in 1992-2000.

Dennis


.
                                                                           
                          
--- SBBSecho 2.11-Win32