On 06/05/18 23:22, druck wrote:
> On 06/05/2018 11:28, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 06/05/18 10:37, druck wrote:
>>> On 06/05/2018 10:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/18 09:27, druck wrote:
>>>>> On 05/05/2018 21:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>>>>> No sir! I intentionally used 192.168.0.n when I was referring to
>>>>>> the new
>>>>>> RPi but 168.192.0.ip when referring to IPs of other hosts on the
>>>>>> LAN. A
>>>>>> quick review sees no typos (in the IPs anyway).
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you using a non-private (Sprint) IP range on your LAN?
>>>>>
>>>>> ---druck
>>>> Why not? Unless he wants to talk to Sprint it makes no odds..
>>>> Or maybe he actually owns that range,
>>>
>>> He doesn't, and should not be using it. If you use a non-private IP
>>> range on a local network, you risk all traffic being exposed externally.
>>
>> Go away and learn enough about routing on the internet to realise how
>> foolish a remark that was.
>
> Words fail me at the stupidity of your comment.

Well in fact which of us spent years of his life building the Internet?


>
> ---druck
>


--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05