On 06/05/2018 11:28, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 06/05/18 10:37, druck wrote:
>> On 06/05/2018 10:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 06/05/18 09:27, druck wrote:
>>>> On 05/05/2018 21:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>>>> No sir! I intentionally used 192.168.0.n when I was referring to
>>>>> the new
>>>>> RPi but 168.192.0.ip when referring to IPs of other hosts on the
>>>>> LAN. A
>>>>> quick review sees no typos (in the IPs anyway).
>>>>
>>>> Why are you using a non-private (Sprint) IP range on your LAN?
>>>>
>>>> ---druck
>>> Why not? Unless he wants to talk to Sprint it makes no odds..
>>> Or maybe he actually owns that range,
>>
>> He doesn't, and should not be using it. If you use a non-private IP
>> range on a local network, you risk all traffic being exposed externally.
>
> Go away and learn enough about routing on the internet to realise how
> foolish a remark that was.

Words fail me at the stupidity of your comment.

---druck

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05