On Sun, 06 May 2018 09:27:09 +0100, druck wrote:

> On 05/05/2018 21:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> No sir! I intentionally used 192.168.0.n when I was referring to the
>> new RPi but 168.192.0.ip when referring to IPs of other hosts on the
>> LAN. A quick review sees no typos (in the IPs anyway).
>
> Why are you using a non-private (Sprint) IP range on your LAN?
>
Another typo - ignore it, but my comment about 255.255.255.n vs
255.255.255.ip convention in that post is as I said.


--
Martin    | martin at
Gregorie  | gregorie dot org

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05