On 06/05/2018 10:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 06/05/18 09:27, druck wrote:
>> On 05/05/2018 21:08, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>>> No sir! I intentionally used 192.168.0.n when I was referring to the new
>>> RPi but 168.192.0.ip when referring to IPs of other hosts on the LAN. A
>>> quick review sees no typos (in the IPs anyway).
>>
>> Why are you using a non-private (Sprint) IP range on your LAN?
>>
>> ---druck
> Why not? Unless he wants to talk to Sprint it makes no odds..
> Or maybe he actually owns that range,

He doesn't, and should not be using it. If you use a non-private IP
range on a local network, you risk all traffic being exposed externally.

> Anyway, one assumes it was an example

It's what is called a bad example, and unhelpful to anyone interested in
setting up a working network.

---druck

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05