> Ward Dossche wrote in a message to Joe Delahaye:

>> Joe,
>>
>> It also states one vote for one ZC.
>>
>> It absolutely does NOT say that. Policy mentions verbatim:
>>
>> ************************* QUOTE *************************
>> 7.2  Selection
>>
>> The International Coordinator is selected (or removed) by an
>> absolute majority vote of the Zone Coordinators.
>> ************************ UNQUOTE ************************
>>
>> Do you see somewhere "one ZC-one vote"? Because I don't!
>>
>> But that doesn't even matter. The interpretation which I as IC
>> issued merely explains how the words "absolute majority" are to be
>> read and understood. It does not alter one single letter of P4,
>> just makes it easier to understand.

> I've been pondering this issue....it's finally dawned on me that the
> real question is are you the person carrying the tablets of stone, or the one
> who caused them to be writ?

>I suspect that given your delusional statements that you are the IC, we'll nex
> hear that you were the author of the tablets.


Aw, Thom, he forgets that historically it has _already_ been quite clear
exactly what "clear majority" means :)  Never in the history of
Fidonet has that phrase been considered "unlear", or mysterious.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag-5