In article ,
 "Ken from Chicago"  wrote:

> "Michael Bowker"  wrote in message 
> news:NOOdnW5flaRffPvUnZ2dnUVZ_s3inZ2d{at}posted.rawbandwidth...
> > Ken from Chicago wrote:
> >> "Michael Bowker" 
wrote in message 
> >> news:rfKdneqa4vp3FPjUnZ2dnUVZ_ukAAAAA{at}posted.rawbandwidth...
> >>> Anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>>> In article ,
> >>>>  Merrick Baldelli  wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:18:58 GMT,
pgalimatias{at}hotmail.com (Pelerin
> >>>>> Galimatias) wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I enjoyed watching it again although I don't
like the loss of two
> >>>>>> major characters.  It had great potential on TV.
> >>>>> I swear watching fans of "Firefly" is
like watching the cult
> >>>>> of Star Trek 30+ years ago.
> >>>> When Trek was still good.
> >>>>
> >>> Trek is still good.
> >>>
> >>> Trek will always be good.
> >>>
> >>> Not so sure about the follow on series.
> >>>
> >>> :)
> >>
> >> DS9: Best. tv Trek (spinoff). Ever.
> >>
> >> -- Ken from Chicago
> >
> > I agree with that and yet I stand by my statement. :)
> 
> TNG was good but it peaked in its 4th season and fell off considerably 
> afterward.
> VOY had potential but was continually half a step off, if not flat out 
> stupid.
> ENT was the one I gave up on after 8 eps, altho its 4th season, the season 
> of Manny, was reportedly good, but by then the damage had been done.

ENT season 4 was like the last few episodes of Flash Gordon; people 
thought it was good, but only because what had come before was so 
incredibly bad.
> 
> -- Ken from Chicago
> 
> P.S. Altho I was fond of TAS, but I was a kid then so I might have had 
> blinders then.

-- 
Bad Reboot's 'Crap Trek' 2009:  "No Shat, No Show"
Rated "least anticipated film of 2009" by ETOnline
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32