From: Randall Parker 

Geo wrote:
> Well maybe if you define "dynamic content" for me. I mean
that covers a lot
> of ground. For example talking to a database is cake but providing a live
> traceroute function is a whole nother story..

I mean stuff like looking up stuff in a DB and then generating HTML that displays it.
A page description language that is pretty rich but doesn't give the user the ability
to shell out and make any OS calls.


> I was really hoping Server03 web edition would have some of those features
> but it turned out to be just a hybrid version of workstation/server with a
> special license to address some ISP issues and create others. I agree about
> the overhead issues and I believe there are probably some serious licensing
> issues as well with the virtual approach.

I also want the ability to make a single app not take more than X percent of the CPU
on the desktop. Simple priority levels do not cut it. I want some app to get at most
25% of the CPU but to get that full amount if it wants it. Can't do that
with priority levels.

> Geo.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5