Janis,
 
> 1 - At the time of the election Bin Li was present and voting as an
> internet node.  That, at the time, was a temporary measure as he had lost
> the use of his modem.
 
Bin Li has not been reachable by PSTN since about day-1 that he was in the
ZC-slot. I don't know before but I have my reservations about that period
as well.
 
He said he would fix it, get new modem, have another phone-number listed to
make him compliant. Nothing of that all. Bin Li as a ZC is a non-event, he
didn't happen. Simple.
 
> 2 - Had Bin Li been removed from the nodelist, had all of Zone 6 asked to
> be removed from the nodelist, Ward would still have been removed by vote
> of the present and voting ZCs. THAT is what counts.
 
By any definition in the book I have not been removed, your attempt at
overthrow failed. Simple. Even as a sysop he doesn't qualify.
 
> 3 - Ward's attempts to change policy in the way that he would have
> changed it is what is FAR and AWAY against policy 4.
 
I have not changed a single letter nor sylable of P4. Just issued an
interpretation, as described by P4, on how to read and understand
"absolute majority". It is not my problem that you were leading
an "obsolete" majority, that's what has you confused.
 
> .  Policy 4 is very clear on what exactly can and
> cannot be changed.  If you need me to clarify this for you any more, just
> say the word, and I'll present the relative text of that document to you.
 
So now you imply that Alex is an idiot?
 
What else is next?
 
 \%/{at}rd

--- DB 1.58/001877