>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:17:10 -0400, Vince M Hudd wrote
(in article ):

>     [ The following text is in the "iso-8859-15" character set. ]
>     [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-1" character set.  ]
>     [ Some special characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
> 
> Amy Guskin  wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 06:26:06 -0400, Vince M Hudd wrote
>>> Amy Guskin  wrote:
>>>> (in article ):
> 
>>>>> Oh, and VERY bummed that they ********* **************
  <<
>>> 
>>>> Dude, some people still have it sitting on their DVRs,
unwatched!  It
>>>> only aired two days ago!
>>> 
>>> Note: I've extended your spoiler removal to include what David said
>>> they've done, let alone the subject of that action! <<
>  
>> Fair enough.  I didn't think that through, but don't think most people
>> would be *too* surprised to see that action happen on a cop/action show,
>> anyway. :-)
> 
> True, but when that action is combined with a masked out subject then the
> action becomes more significant because the we can infer from the masking
> that the subject is important to the show (or that week's episode thereof). 
<<

Yes, you're absolutely correct.  I'll remember that next time someone drops a 
spoiler bomb.

>>>> (imagine me sitting in the living room set from my
imagined fabulously
>> successful sitcom about the wacky adventures of someone who works in
>> copyright and shares an apartment with her handsome best friend, both of
>> them single and looking  titled "Infringe Benefits" 
sitting comfotably
>> in a sweater, head tilted, scratching the head of a lovable pooch on my
>> lap, and looking up at the camera as I say):
> 
> So, not with a bald head and white suit, wearing a monocle and stroking a
> white cat? <<

Moi, bald?!  (I do have cats, but not a white one.)

Amy
-- 
Ten Thousand Questions
A Question a Day for Journaling, Self-Discovery, and Transformation
"2010 is the Year of Questions"
tenthousandquestions.com
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32