Hi, Lee Lofaso!
I read your message from 06.11.2017 02:39
ak>>>> No war will be with North Korea.
RB>>> Unless Kim miscalculates. But even he must know what will happen
RB>>> if he goes too far. His threats won't mean much then.
ak>>>> The US is a cynical liar. It perfectly knows that NK's nuclear
ak>>>> program is defensive.
RB>>> Yeah, sure. Kim proves that nearly every day with threats to nuke
RB>>> Guam or even the USA, plus naturally South Korea. Some "defence".
ak>> Both sides exchange with threats. It is like hysteric barking of
ak>> two dogs. It is better to bark loudly that to fight in honest. But
ak>> a small dog always have less reason for fighting. It barks
ak>> furiously only when it fears the big dog.
LL> Not true. Little dog tempt big dog to chase tail. After big dog
LL> takes bait, little dog run really fast. Run underneath pipe hidden
LL> behind bushes. Big dog smash into pipe knocking itself out cold.
LL> Then little dog stand victorious, wagging tail for all to see.
The main difference is that the little dog has nowhere to run
underneath. ;-). Another problem is that the US considers any situation
as outrages if it cannot strike with impunity. ;-) Such a situation also
happened when the USSR was making a nuclear bomb in the late of 194s.
The US then made many plans for massive atomic strikes on the USSR.
Because it was becoming outrageously protected! A typical armed cowboy
don't like another armed cowboy. In this case the cowboy should speak
with this snotty opponent on equal footing!!! Such a disgrace is like a
splitter in his bum and heart. 8-)
RB>>> So little boy threatens big boy.
ak>> Read again my explanation about two dogs above.
LL> Chinese bred dogs for protection. Big dogs for outside, little dogs
LL> for inside. However, all dogs love raw meat. Which is why dogs must
LL> always be fed before they are put on duty.
You've guessed it, and you won't ask whom China would prefer to have
under its side - North Korea or the US military bases after the US
invasion. China will defend NK. Exactly this message Trump will get
tomorrow when he meet the Chinese leader.
ak>> Now China has enough influence and military power to prohibit any
ak>> using of nukes near its territory. Such actions are impossible
ak>> without informing China and its consent. Usually big dogs fight
ak>> only with small dogs.
LL> Dear leader has offed his uncle and half-brother, both of whom were
LL> close to China. Why was this done? To send a message that needed no
LL> translation.
LL> If dear leader is allowed to keep nukes, others will be sure to
LL> build their own. South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Myanmar, Australia
LL> all come to mind.
Well, North Korea can have all the atomic weapon of the USSR, but the
situation in this case will be the same. The atomic weapon now is a
deterrent. Both sides know that it is suicide to use it. Theoretically
it is just a waste of money if there is a possibility to defend yourself
without it.
LL> South Korea) to develop nuclear weapons? Less than six months. How
LL> much of a stockpile can each country have within that time period?
LL> Best estimates are at least 4,000 for South Korea. And with Japan
LL> feeling threatened, it would likely ditch its pacifist constitution
LL> in favor of what it once had prior to the end of WWII.
I repeat again, now all the countries that are looking for an atomic
bomb look for it as a mean of defense. There is no threat from such
countries to the world unless there is aggression against these
countries. No problem.
LL> Wouldn't that be lovely? The world does not need the US (or Russia)
LL> to blow itself up. It can do so on its own quite nicely.
But if the USSR had not obtained the nuclear bomb in time it had been
mercilessly nuked by the US. But in reality, the atomic weapon has given
peace to the world. Well, it looks similar to the old US country side
when many cowboys have guns in their pockets and peace and politeness
thrives. ;=)
Bye, Lee!
Alexander Koryagin
fido7.fidonews 2017
--- FIDOGATE 5.1.7ds
* Origin: Pushkin's BBS (2:5020/2140.2)
|