On 01/05/18 11:46, Andy Leighton wrote:
>> C sits nicely between the overwight syntax and non portability of
>> assembler, and teh ineffeicient and unintelligent langeuages of computer
>> scientists, who instead of respecting the hardware upon which their code
>> nust run, as COBOL, FORTRAN and B/BCPL/C did, instead ignore it in their
>> search for symmetry elegance and presumably geek status, whils what they
>> have implemented rumbles along overblown and overweight and bug filled.
> Now you are trolling. I have written stuff in a number of assembly
> languages, and in C and wouldn't say anything close to that.
Well so have I, and I would.
Modern code is appalling.
--
Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich
people
by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are
poor.
Peter Thompson
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|