From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: ahk{at}chinet.com
Subject: Re: Kate Mulgrew says Sun revolves around the Earth

David Johnston   wrote:
>On 4/9/2014 5:13 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> David Johnston  wrote:
>>> On 4/9/2014 4:51 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>> David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>> On 4/9/2014 4:22 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>> David Johnston  wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/9/2014 9:30 AM, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>>>>>>> Joe Pfeiffer  wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman"
 writes:
>>>>>>>>>> David Johnston
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/8/2014 2:44 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let the furious backpedalling begin!
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is not backpedalling to
deny holding a position that one never
>>>>>>>>>>> claimed to hold.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> She knew she was working for
Robert Sungenis and what his
>>>>>>>>>> reputation was.  So, yeah, "I
don't stand behind the work I was
>>>>>>>>>> just paid for" is backpedalling.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> She's a compensated spokesman,
literally. Wrong again, Johnston.
>>
>>>>>>>> >From shawn
's quote of her statement:
>>>>>>>>>> proponent of geocentrism. More
importantly, I do not subscribe to
>>>>>>>>>> anything Robert Sungenis has
written regarding science and
>history and,
>>>>>>>>>> had I known of his involvement,
would most certainly have avoided this
>>>>>>>>>> documentary. I was a voice for
hire, and a misinformed one, at that. I
>>
>>>>>>>>> So she says she didn't know she was
working for Sungenis.
>>
>>>>>>>> yeah, that seems unlikely.  I mean, it's
*possible* but it would take a
>>>>>>>> really concerted effort on Sungenis' part
to hide his identity, and why?
>>
>>>>>>> No, it wouldn't.  All it would require is for
him to deal with her on a
>>>>>>> corporate basis.  And there's no way she would
have known who the hell
>>>>>>> he was if his name happened to come up anyway.
>>
>>>>>> I learned who he was with two seconds of Googing,
>>
>>>>> But you did have to do that two seconds of Googling. 
You couldn't just
>>>>> immediately hear the name and know he was a nutbar.
>>
>>>> Nice backpedal, Johnston.
>>
>>>From what?
>>
>>  From the excuses you were making for her.
>
>No I haven't backpedaled from them at all.  I still think she had no 
>idea who had hired her.

That she claims not to know was never the issue, Johnston. You're choosing
to defend her claim because you're playing your usual games. I can repeat
it another twelve times; perhaps the point will set in. I know you have
the ability to make up meaningless excuses. You trying to hire out as a
P.R. flack? Luck on your project.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux