| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | win98se updates CD |
| ML> windows update is telling me that it only wants that one i just | ML> mentioned... however, when i look at IE's about box and compare it BR> Let it do, it's usually right in this case, it is failing miserably unless m$ is releasing the same update with hidden changes on a daily basis... KB837009 has been installed here several times and it still wants to be installed each and every day by the critical update notification utility and windows update :( BR>> Apply in listed order, that's what update would do if you applied | ML> listed order? newest to oldest? i've never really written them down BR> No, no... listed is Top to Bottom hummm... as said before, i've never really noted the order... with this particular case at hand, i really have to wonder what would happen when there are more than one update for an old package with the newest and superceeding one being downloaded and applied first before any secondary ones that should be applied before that superceeding one... just to note, the reinstall put IE4 or 5 in place (whatever was in the original win98se when it was released)... one of the very first updates that windows update applied was IE6SP(latest)... this has lead to this particular sticky wicket that i'm trying to get to the bottom of... )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 3634/12 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.