From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_009F_01C665E4.EEF6D320
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   I read the article before you felt compelled to quote negative =
excerpts from it and am capable of distinguishing between that and your =
personal bullshit.  Aren't you? =20

   Vista does not prompt for elevation multiple times for a single task =
and the article didn't claim it did.  Given that you have never used =
Vista why would you personally make false claims?  Isn't personal = honesty
an issue for you?

   I have no doubt you see what you want to see.  If we are to judge by =
the propaganda you post here, it clearly shows that you are blind to =
anything that doesn't take a negative position that you would like to =
agree with.

Rich

  "Mike '/m'"  wrote in message =
news:eo6k42h77i0u1eq3mf192tgi0k3im39ib6{at}4ax.com...
  On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:51:46 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:

  > Bullshit!  I suspect you haven't used Vista or Vista with=20
  > UAP so your comments are plucked from your ass.

  Partially correct.  I have not used Vista.  However, the comments I
  posted were taken from an article written by someone who had been =
using
  Vista, someone who has been very pro-Windows.


  > OS X prompting is very similarly.  I haven't played with=20
  > OS X much but from what I did see it is identical in the=20
  > model for when to prompt.

  Sorry, Rich, OS-X does prompt once for each Administrative task, not
  several times throughout the task as the article I quoted indicates
  about Vista.

  In the rush to get Vista out the door eventually, it is looking like
  many short cuts have been taken and are continuing to be taken;
  resulting in, among other things, the annoying behavior of endless
  prompts cited in the article I quoted. =20

  The comments I have been seeing from Windows cheerleaders about =
Vista's
  shortcomings and unmet promises are growing in number and volume.  If
  you don't like that, then you perhaps you should listen to what they =
are
  saying and get your employer to fix the problem.  Unfortuantely that =
may
  mean even more delays for Vista which so far has had the gestation
  period of an elephant.  Vista will probably be as bulky with it is
  finally born.

   /m
------=_NextPart_000_009F_01C665E4.EEF6D320
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   I read
the article before =
you felt=20
compelled to quote negative excerpts from it and am capable of=20
distinguishing between that and your personal bullshit.  Aren't =
you? =20

 
   Vista
does not prompt for =
elevation=20
multiple times for a single task and the article didn't claim it = did. =20
Given that you have never used Vista why would you personally make false =

claims?  Isn't personal honesty an issue for you?
 
   I have no
doubt you see =
what you want=20
to see.  If we are to judge by the propaganda you post here, it = clearly=20
shows that you are blind to anything that doesn't take a negative = position that=20
you would like to agree with.
 
Rich
 

  "Mike '/m'" <mike{at}barkto.com>=20">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>=20
  wrote in message news:eo6k42h77i0=
u1eq3mf192tgi0k3im39ib6{at}4ax.com...On=20
  Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:51:46 -0700, "Rich" <{at}>
wrote:>=20
  Bullshit!  I suspect you haven't used Vista or Vista with =
> UAP so=20
  your comments are plucked from your ass.Partially =
correct.  I=20
  have not used Vista.  However, the comments Iposted were =
taken from=20
  an article written by someone who had been usingVista, someone who =
has=20
  been very pro-Windows.> OS X
prompting is very =
similarly. =20
  I haven't played with > OS X much but from what I did see it is =

  identical in the > model for when to
prompt.Sorry, =
Rich, OS-X=20
  does prompt once for each Administrative task, notseveral times =
throughout=20
  the task as the article I quoted indicatesabout
Vista.In =
the rush=20
  to get Vista out the door eventually, it is looking likemany short =
cuts=20
  have been taken and are continuing to be taken;resulting in, among =
other=20
  things, the annoying behavior of endlessprompts cited in the =
article I=20
  quoted.  The comments I have been seeing
from Windows=20
  cheerleaders about Vista'sshortcomings and unmet promises are =
growing in=20
  number and volume.  Ifyou don't like that, then you perhaps =
you=20
  should listen to what they aresaying and get your employer to fix =
the=20
  problem.  Unfortuantely that maymean even more delays for =
Vista which=20
  so far has had the gestationperiod of an elephant.  Vista =
will=20
  probably be as bulky with it isfinally=20
born. /m

------=_NextPart_000_009F_01C665E4.EEF6D320--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5