Received: from saf.tzo.com ([140.239.225.181])
 by fanciful.org (wcSMTP v5.6.450.3)
 with SMTP id 624776906; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:00:44 -0800
Received: from 199.185.220.224 by saf.tzo.com
 id 2003020216015560911 for photo{at}fanciful.org;
 Sun, 02 Feb 2003 21:01:55 GMT
Received: from pii400 ([66.222.145.239]) by priv-edtnes44.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with SMTP
          id 
          for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:00:40 -0700
Message-ID: 
From: "Larry N. Bolch" 
To: 
References: 
Subject: Re: Re:Re:Re:RE: An inspiration!
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 14:00:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Carl Cook  wrote:
> At 07:16 PM 1/30/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>
>>  >If only ONE viewer of my work says that ... Check that ... If *I* can
>> say that about my own work, I'll be more than happy.  >Bringing
out "the
>> model's personality and sense of humor" ... what else even comes close?
>>
>> I think it was Berenice (sp) Abbot who was firm in her belief that nude
>> studies should not in any circumstance show any of the personality of the
>> model. It was her view to show the model as a real person was to make the
>> image sexual in nature and  wrong. Boy, she's like Cleopatra, Queen of
>> de-Nile! The nude human body is by it's very nature a sexual thing.
>> Something to do with basic reproductive processes, culture,  or something
>> like that.
>>
>> All well and good, Carl, but I am not Bernice Abbott.
>
>
> You're not? Larry said you were. I'm crushed. I was going to ask for an
> autograph! :)

I was only spoofing, 'cause he dresses like her. He is acutally Dianne Arbus
redux.

;-D

larry!
ICQ 76620504
http://www.larry-bolch.com/

--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5