| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Forward File routing |
JD> It behaved like this: JD> Write a netmail w/ a file attached ( using a FQPath), JD> and save with FM, the editor that comes with FD. JD> IOW, I too used a FQPath in FM, and immediately upon JD> restarting FD found that the newly created .pkt did not JD> have the FQPath in it. The other file did. JD> FD therefore is designed to not send out the FQPath. JD> Just the same, for example, as Squish in a Bink setup does. JD> This is leading me to believe that the "normal" way is JD> for the sender's system to remove the FQPath. I've recently been sending files as attachments to netmail in Maximus, with Squish handling the mail packing. I'm sticking in the full path in the netmail that I write. Once squish is done, the netmail viewable on the BBS shows that the path has been stripped, and squish has properly set the path for sending out the file. [And my BinkP sessions are showing the file properly being sent from my specified location.] So, yes, Squish (1.11?) / Maximus (3.01?) running under OS/2 is working this way. I haven't tested the Linux compiled code at this point in time. Take care..... Bob Jones, 1:343/41 --- Maximus/2 3.01* Origin: Top Hat 2 BBS (1:343/41) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 343/41 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.