* Forwarded (from: jamnntpd) by mark lewis using timEd/2 1.10.y2k+.
* Originally from Scott Street (1:266/420.1) to Björn Felten.
* Original dated: Thu Jun 28 2012, 13:30

On 6/27/2012 5:12 PM, Bj”rn Felten -> Scott Street wrote:

 SS>> I've just pulled the win32 zip off the website until I
 SS>> can track down the issue.

 BF>     Ahhh... Just as I put in my Billings folder here. I'll pull if off
 BF> too, then.

 SS>> Look for a new version, perhaps tomorrow.

Well,  last night,  I did two things.

First,  I too the original 1.0 source (non-smapi) and got it to compile in
Visual C++ 2010 Express.  Which, was easier then trying to get my MIGW32 to
build it.  Then I cleaned up the code to reduce the warnings to VCE complaining
only about using stricmp - some warning about being insecure?!? - added that to
my to-do list.

Secondly,  I merged my SSL and performance improvements into the original code
base.  I also cleaned up unused local variables.  I am currently testing the
build on my point (posted this message with it) as well as having my automated
testing scripts hammer my poor Windows VM for all its worth! :)

 BF>     No hurry, mate! We've been waiting for years for something to happen
 BF> here, and you certainly are a breeze of fresh air in those dusty
 BF> chambers of ours. :)

Yeah, but I feel I got everyone's hopes up...  I hate to disappoint.

 BF>     Not that I'm all that interested in the MSG format, but Squish might
 BF> have been interesting eight years ago (I've used SquishMail on 2:203/0
 BF> for more than a decade and half or so, so I already had most of the
 BF> echoes in SQM format). Not any more, really, though...

After reading this is when I decided that the bloat of supporting all those
different message bases, when only JAM is actually useful to me (and it seems
others) did I backtrack to the non-smapi version.

___
 - Origin: -=[ SSAlpha da'Point/win32 ]=- (1:266/420.1)

[/END of FORWARD]

)\/(ark