12 Feb 11 17:19, mark lewis wrote to Roger Nelson:


 RW>> I'll grant there have been no amendments to policy, but it appears
 RW>> from here to be at least a stable situation without the open
 RW>> warfare that was apparently the norm then.

 RN>> P4 was never ratified by the grunt SysOps, but there are those who
 RN>> have a different view about it.

 ml> i still fail to understand this... yes, in some areas, the defined
 ml> and published methodology was not fully followed but that still
 ml> doesn't negate the fact that P4 was put to the populace for voting...

Which mattered not. As were many other things, over the years, presented
to the sysops for voting, only to have the *Cs involved vote his/her own
opinion. Witness one RC12, who voted what he wanted instead of what was
voted for in a regional election by the R12 sysops.

Had there actually been a sysop vote, P4 certainly wouldn't have been made
policy by anyone who could read and understand what P4 actually says.

                R\%/itt

  Fox News was not used as a source for information in this message!

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000-10