| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: IP v6 |
-=> Bo Simonsen wrote to Michiel van der Vlist <=- BS> Yeah.. but not that I like this situation but I really think something BS> serious must happen before the ISPs are being forced to use IPv6 on BS> wide-spread basis. I'm waiting for home routers to build in IPV6/IPV4 gateways - the network can go IPV6, people will still have a NAT-ed private class C address on the inside. It doesn't get the user any of the perks of a full IPV6 network, (like getting rid of NAT) but it's cheap and easy to implement. I can imagine the ISPs pushing something like this instead of opening up the network. kurt weiske | kweiske at realitycheckbbs dot org | http://realitycheckbbs.org ... "Proximity alert. Must be coming up on something." --- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49 --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | information is power. (1:218/700) SEEN-BY: 3/0 633/267 640/954 712/0 620 848 @PATH: 10/1 261/38 712/848 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.