| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | MG vs SL |
G'day mark 21 Sep 04 16:10, mark lewis wrote to Alex Shakhaylo: JD>>> Actually no. Many years ago, several people who were excommed, JD>>> continued to be XAB. They did not go away, and were even helped by JD>>> some who shouild have known better. AS>> How could they contnue XAB not being in a nodelist ? ml> in the case of the packet-rammers, they kept dumping forged packets ml> into the inbound of insecure nodes... But - once one is no longer in Fidonet, Policy 4.0x has no juristiction to declare someone XAB. Regards, David --- Msged/LNX TE 06 (pre)* Origin: Here. (3:640/305) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 640/305 280/5555 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.