> RS>Not all Trekkies went "whole hawg".
 > Righto.  The ones that didn't became Trekkers. 
How sad. :)
 > RS> >  BN> the -kies coined the term *-ker* as a means of differentiation, 
&
 > RS>Not all -kies like the term -ker, either.
 > Of course not -- they're embarrassed. 
Yes, I agree. Trekkies are embarrassed for Trekkers. 
 > RS>Not true. You can remain a trekkie, if you want. Not *all* trekkies are
 > RS>considered as having no life. 
 > Uh, yes, they are, I'se afeared, unless the definitions have
 > recently been altered by revisionist historians when I wasn't
 > looking. 
That's what you get for blinking. You missed the whole thing. :)
 > RS> >  And just what _does_ Zorch say on the issue?
 > RS>Yes, what does the EchoLongWindedOne have to say on this issue?
 > 'Scuse me whilst I go brew up a dozen or so pots of coffee.
 > hehehehehehehehe
I'll join ya. 
TTYL
Rita
--- FMail 0.98+/RA 2.02+
---------------