TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: nthelp
to: All
from: Randall Parker
date: 2006-05-25 19:35:34
subject: Security suites compared

From: Randall Parker 

They liked Symantec's overall. But they also complained of pop-ups (which I
thoroughly hate):

Symantec's suite seemed to talk the most, regularly popping up software status alerts
and cookie warnings.

http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,125817,pg,1,00.asp

We contracted with German research company AV-Test.org, which threw more than 174,000
worms, viruses, back-door programs, bots (aka zombies), spyware components, Trojan
horses, and adware samples at each suite. In addition, AV-Test.org analyzed each
suite's heuristics (its ability to detect as-yet-unidentified malware), as well as
each firewall. We also checked how fast each could perform a full security sweep of
our test system and how much running it slowed down our apps in our
WorldBench 5 tests.

Though our testing was extensive, we didn't fully evaluate behavior-based detection.
The Microsoft, Panda, and Zone Labs suites offer this technology, which can identify
a new threat by the actions it takes (for example, if a program tries to
make suspicious Registry changes). This feature can offer a viable
supplement to signature-based detection, but testing it thoroughly proved
too unwieldy for this review.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786
@PATH: 379/45 1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.