Jeff Binkley -> Ed Hulett wrote:


 EH>>>> That is your opinion borne out of ignorance.

 RS>>>>> No one has ever showed anything confirmable, to date.

 EH>>>> Why should anyone show proof of anything to your lot?

 RS>>>>> That includes your whacko cult, Ed.

 EH>>>> And here we have a personal slam. Did you take the time to read
 EH>>>> the new rules?

 RS>>>>> Prostitution perhaps is the "oldest
profession," but religion
 EH>> is  EH>> the oldest
 RS>>>>> con job.

 EH>>>> In your ignorant opinion.

 RS>>>>> "Believe in my deity, and hand over money! Who
cares if there
 EH>> is  EH>> nothing to
 RS>>>>> it!"

 EH>>>> You have no earthly clue about which you speak.

 RS>>>>> And you have been totally suckered by your cult. No
ifs, ands,
 EH>>>>   or buts.

 EH>>>> Yet again, you haven't a clue.

 RS>>>>> There is nothing supernatural, period.

 RS>>> You really are a total sucker.

 EH>> Are you rebutting yourself?

 JB> Indeed.  I was scratching my head on this one.  He responded to himself
 JB> but sent it to you.  I am not sure what he was trying to accomplish.

What's worse is he later answered the above post (to himself this time)
with another scathing insult.

The meltdown continues.

Ed

-- 
"Wise politicians will be cautious about fettering the government with
restrictions that cannot be observed, because they know that every
break of the fundamental laws, though dictated by necessity, impairs
that sacred reverence which ought to be maintained in the breast of
rulers towards the constitution of a country."

--Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 25, 21 December 1787

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)