>> I wrote some hard stuff to see if I could flush any out. I was
 >> amazed the find that Niels Petersen (I wish he's settle one name
 >> for a while) jumped up using that very logic: "If I'd been there
 >> with my trusty 303 I could have killed Bryant and saved the
 >> world." It's really sad.

 >  NP> Yes it is really sad that Bob lawrence, a person who I thought
 >  NP> could read and comprehend to some extent, could manage to
 >  NP> garble my words (or his interpretation of them) to such an
 >  NP> extent that they bore absolutely no resemblence to what I
 >  NP> actually typed. What I actually wrote was......

 >   I don't give a shit what you wrote

Obviously

 > because I wasn't quoting you.

If you weren't quoting me then why use my name?

Why put a sentence in inverted commas when inverted commas are used to
show a quotation.

Sure looks like a quotation to me.


 > I was quoting an imaginary gun-nut's logic.

An imaginary gun-nut?  Then why use my name?

> It was the *logic* I  quoted, not what you wrote in another message, to
> another person, you silly twit.

Then why use my name attached to a statement I didn't make.

I described a scenario to you and asked YOU a question.
You obviously didn't even SEE the question, as you didn't answer it.

 > And having flipped your lid over an imagined insult,

Theonly thing imagined in the first paragraph of this message is what you imagined.
Read it again and think about it.

--- FMail/386 0.98