GD> GD>Proving non-existence is attempt to prove a negative.  Try
GD> GD>proving  Santa Clause doesn't exist.  
GD> 
GD> GD>The proper way is for the positive claimant to provide evidence
GD> GD>to  support their position.  

GD> JB> Except that in either case when you are dealing with absolutes,
GD> JB> then it  only takes one instances for the tautology to be proven
GD> JB> false.  I'll  leave you to ponder the significance of this.

GD>Ther is absolutely no need to provide evidence that something exists.

GD>It's up to you to provide the evidence and allow me to use the same
GD>method  you used to see if it works.  I explained that in the part of
GD>the post  that you didn't re-quote.  

Your response leaves me to believe that you have no idea of the logical 
significance of my response.  I am fine with that.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Barak Obama thinks we can spend our way to prosperity .....


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10