"Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in
news:9263$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 EH>>> That is a lie. The extreme left is comprised of people like
 EH>   you.

 RS>> BULL-SHIT.

 EH> You are in denial.

I've never been to Egypt.

 RS>>>> As to "eradicating religion," among
progressives, that's a
 EH>   damn EH>>   lie.

 EH>>> Hahahahahahahaha!!!!!

 EH>>> Have you read some of the atheist sites on the web?

 RS>> Fine. Show me.

 EH> Just read some of the atheist sites.

Like I said, SHOW ME.
Unless you're too stupid to do so.

 RS>>>> It's the theocratic right-wing Christians that want our
 EH>>>   government to keep RS> on shoving mandatory Christian rites
 EH>   among EH>>   everyone.

 EH>>> That is nonsense.

 RS>> Again, BULL-SHIT.

 EH> Just like the rest of the extreme left, you think that including
 EH> alternatives to the theory of evolution is "shoving Christian
 EH> mandatory rites among everyone" (sic).

You have no idea what is the "extreme left."

Here they are, stupid.
http://www.cpusa.org/

If you continue to whine about your imaginary "extreme left," no wonder
you joined your cult.

 RS>>>> One example: Mandating the Pledge of Allegiance in schools, as
 EH>>>   it is now. RS> With that "under God" in it,
that was stuck
 EH>   into it EH>>   during McCarthyism in RS> 1954.

 EH>>> Blah blah blah...

 RS>> Is this a fact, or not?

 EH> No one is mandating the pledge. "[U]nder Gad" is a part
of the pledge
 EH> now and will remain so. It makes you look foolish to continue whining
 EH> about it.

BUllSHIT.
http://www.politicalbase.com/issues/mandatory-pledge-of-allegiance/31/

 RS>>>> Don't forget groups that continue to try to shove their
 EH>>>   religious dogma RS> into science classrooms, even though they
 EH>   have EH>>   jack shit to actually back RS> up their suppositions.

 EH>>> Like I said, you people want to eradicate religion from
 EH>   society. You EH>> keep pointing to Jefferson's comment in a letter
 EH>   to a Baptist minister EH>> where he talked of a "wall
of separation"
 EH>   between church and state as EH>> if it was stated as such in the
 EH>   Bill of Rights.

 RS>> Fine. *WHICH* religion you want in our government, which is what
 RS>> Jefferson was addressing in that letter?

 EH> Good grief, you do go on about some silly things. I support the First
 EH> Amendment -- "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
 EH> of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise there of;..."

Quit running away from your whines.

 RS>> If the loudest religion in government pushers had their way,
 EH>   *YOUR* RS> religion would be illegal.

 EH> You don't know what you are talking about. No religion, other than
 EH> Islam, wants theocratic control of government.

 EH>>> What you people keep ignoring is that the real language in the
 EH>   First EH>> Amendment states something entirely different.
"Congress
 EH>   shall make EH>> not law respecting the establishment of religion, or
 EH>   prohibiting the EH>> free exercise thereof;...

 RS>> And this means as the Supreme Court keeps stating, over and over
 EH>   and RS> over is that our government is *NEUTRAL* regarding religion.

 EH> Exactly!

And you theocrats continue to run to the courts.

 EH>>> You people want to prohibit the free exercise of religion
 EH>   wherever you EH>> find it.

 RS>> That is simply a damn lie, pushed by theocrats.

 EH> No, it is not. It's the truth.

In your conservafairyland.

 RS>> Tell you what.
 RS>> You have a public park you walk/drive past on a regular basis?

 EH> Yes.

 RS>> Suppose one day you see a monument having been erected there,
 EH>   glorifying RS> Islam, complete with loudspeakers gving a call to
 EH>   prayer several times a RS> day.

 EH> Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

 EH> Do they have mosques in Wisconsin that have loud speakers giving the
 EH> call to prayer? To my knowledge that only happens in majority Muslim
 EH> countries.

No.

 EH> The closest Islamic congregational building from here is about 4 miles
 EH> away. It's also very small.

Want a bigger one?
..
 RS>> Would you just ignore it? Fat chance.

 EH> A loud speaker calling to prayer is different than an innocuous Ten
 EH> Commandments on display in a court of law.

Because all of them are against the Constitution.

 RS>> So why should you ditwit "Christian" theocrats be allowed to
 EH>   stick your RS> Christian crap in any public area?

 EH> Why shouldn't we? What bother is it to you to have to walk by a
 EH> display of the "Ten Commandments" on your way into court?

Because it's religious bigotry. PERIOD.

 RS>> Look up Roy Moore, then get back to me.

 EH> Why should I? You want to make a point, make it!

Look it up, that is, if you're not too stupid to do so.

FTB cultist.

--- Xnews/5.04.25