Joseph DeMartino wrote:
> John W. Kennedy wrote:
> 
> 
>>In my experience, all that is necessary to fail voir dire is to speak
>>in complete sentences and carefully to make nice distinctions; any
>>lawyer that's relying on his ability to confuse the jury (and there's
>>always at least one) will panic at the thought of a juror who is so
>>unreasonable as to employ reason in full public view. But unless you
>>are in a one-day/one-trial jurisdiction, that won't help.
> 
> 
> And in my experience this is utter bunk.  As with everything else in
> life, context is all.  

And I work for a personal lines insurance company (auto, home, etc), and 
served on two drunk-driving cases!

Blair
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32