* In a message to Steve Brack on 10-01-97, CHARLES HUNTER said the following:
CH> SB> Owing to a generational difference 8-), I've never seen an
CH> > IMTS phone in operation. Could one of the more experienced
CH> > participants fill me in on how the system worked? I think I
CH> > saw it on "Perry Mason" on TV once, but I'm not sure.
CH>
CH> Improved Mobile Telephone Service (IMTS) operated primarily on the
CH> 150 MHZ band (Similar in 450 MHz). Basically the mobile unit consisted
CH> of a trunk mounted transceiver with a telephone style head with (I
CH> believe) 11 channels. (e.g. YP, JP, etc.). The control heads initially
CH> had rotary dials and used pulse dialing; but were replaced by touch
CH> tone pads. They were great units. Because of the VHF frequency, I
CH> could get on top of a mountain 40 or 50 miles away from my home area
CH> and get into my home service area avoiding toll charges and roaming
CH> charges. (Don't remember for sure if there were roaming charges). The
CH> two best IMTS phones that I remember were the Motorola and the RF
CH> Communications (later known as Harris). The transmitter packs, as I
CH> remember transmitted at 25 or 50 watts of power. The automation in the
CH> system consisted of the unit scanning for available IMTS frequencies to
CH> make a call; and with the base stations sending out a call by scanning
CH> channels to find one your unit was on.
Thanks, Charles. That's a bit different from the system I saw
on TV, which relied on an operator to get your number for you.
I'm guessing it was an earlier version of the same system.
Your explanation does raise a couple of questions for me. How
did individual units identify themselves to the "system" for
billing purposes, and how did individual phones know when it
was them being called? I know how cellphones do it, but I
don't see how a system lacking a "control channel" could.
-- SPEED 2.00 #2712: Missed me by THAT much -- Maxwell Smart
--- GEcho 1.00
---------------
* Origin: 9-1-1 FF's LEO's OSHA COMMS (619) 669-0385 (1:202/911)
|