Re: Git Vs. CVS
By: Diamond Dave to All on Mon Aug 24 2020 05:17 am
> Rob,
>
> Congrats from moving from CVS to Git. I'm sure overall it will be better for
> you, Deuce, and other developers.
>
> However, one thing I did notice is that if I download a file from there, it
> shows the current date, not the date it was created. So in looking at the
> actual file, it's hard to say it's something from 10 years ago or yesterday.
> Yes, I know I can look at the website and see when a file was actually
> updated, but if I download a copy of a directory, all the files show the
> current date. In the CVS version, the actual file creation date was shown.
>
> Thoughts?
I've never noticed the file's dates on a cvs checkout. Indeed, the cvs client
would set the local file time stamp to that of the last-modification date/time
in the repository. And Git doesn't do that:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2458042/restore-a-files-modification-time-i
n-git
digital man
Sling Blade quote #11:
Doyle Hargraves (to Karl): What in the hell you doin' with that hammer?
Norco, CA WX: 92.4øF, 46.0% humidity, 4 mph NE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
--- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
|