From: "Bill Mattox" 

Who said it was a moral choice? Clinton put into action the same type of
evil processes he almost always puts into play when it suits his whim, and
for the same reason... it benefits HIM.

A moral choice would have been, at best, a neutral guardian (impossible
from the Clinton camp, of course) and the opportunity for the court process
to run its course and carefully assertain (to the extent possible) what
forces are tugging at this boy and the likely consequence to him of one
prevailing over the other. To simply assume the father is making free
choices apart from a potential gun to his head is to be willfully blind to
the larger dynamic. In which case, which of us is demonstrating true bias?

"Judy Folkenberg"  wrote in
message news:3906D13C.A24F3B2C{at}mail.nlm.nih.gov...
>
>
> Richard Hong wrote:
>
> > >>   It's the only moral thing to do.  I thank God that for once he's
found a
> > reason to make a moral choice.
> >
>
> Kind of funny that when Clinton does make a moral choice, his haters still
> aren't happy.
>
> Judy
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5