| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ZC/2-status |
Hi Thom! 24 Sep 04, Thom LaCosta wrote to Vladimir Donskoy: VD>> I understand you. But we not want to divide FIDONET, we want only VD>> separation to our own Zone in the FIDONET! So - Zone7 must to be in VD>> common FIDONET nodelist and letter to it can delivery. TL> One problem is that in order to do that each ZC in zones 1 through 6 must TL> agree to include Zone 7 in the nodelists they produce. Yes. But all other ZCs are agree - we asked these. TL> In view of the fact that ZC2 refuses to acknowledge that he is no longer TL> IC and your statements that he is not supportive of Zone 7, how do you TL> anticipate being able to communicate with Zone 2 nodes if your new zone is TL> not included in the Zone2 nodelist. Yes, it's problem... May be sysops can use nodelist from Z7C if they want write to our zone, but it like not good. TL> Of course, if you've received confirmation from each of the current ZCs TL> that they will include Zone 7 in their nodelists, then the question is TL> answered. Without Z2C all other are agree. Vladimir --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-040321* Origin: DVB Station (2:5020/2992) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 5020/2992 715 292/854 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.