"Jeff Binkley -> Ross Sauer"  wrote in news:9230
$HOLYSMOKE{at}JamNNTPd:

 JB>>>>>>> While you is not singular, you is part of
the set that
 GD>>>>>   includes GD> JB> "you 
Christians".  You do understand
basic
 GD>>>>>   set theory from math GD> JB> ?  Thus my 
question remains.
 GD>>>>>   Can you name any of my religious GD> JB>
beliefs that I
have
 GD>>>>>   proselytized ?

 GD>>>>>> You seem hell bent on making this an xian
nation, for one.

 JB>>>>>> So you have no answer.  Typical.

 GD>>>>> Do you mean you are not going to push for prayer in school?

 GD>>>>> What about ID, aka Creation Science in schools?

 RS>>>> Jeff said he was angry about the Dover, PA ruling on ID.

 JB>>> Angry ?  I made no such statement.

 RS>> You stated you were against that ruling, and you sounded a little
 RS>> angry.

 JB> I did say I was against the ruling.  Anything else was pure projection
 JB> on your part.


 RS>> Now *NO* running away or stupid excuses.

 JB> You run away from everything so a statement like this is outlandish.


 RS>> Why are you against that ruling?

 JB> ID brings many valid questions to the table that current evolution
 JB> theory cannot answer.  It is a perfectly valid argument that open
minded
 JB> people should be willing to discuss.  Given some of the other crap our
 JB> government run schools pollute the minds of our children with, I see
no
 JB> harm in discussing ID.

Intelligent design is based on religious dogma.

Nothing more, nothing less.

--- Xnews/5.04.25