From: "Bill Mattox" 

What law? The 11th court of appeals volunteered to mediate, so there was
nothing clear-cut that would give Clinton the right to do what he did.
Especially something so extreme and potentially life-threatening as an
armed raid in the dead of night.

"Bill Lucy"  wrote in message
news:MPG.136c3a765f08bc7f9897c0{at}news.barkto.com...
> In article , richhong{at}hawksci.com says...
> > >> First, I do understand that there was no warrant for the entry.
> >
> > John,
> >
> > I don't think you need one to enforce an order already issued.  There
was no
> > arrest being made; this was enforcement of a lawful and proper ruling
that
> > the boy should be reunited with his father.
>
> That's right, Rich. The family was already in violation of existing law.
> Therefore, no warrant was necessary.
>
> It's a sad state of affairs where something this heinous has to occur.
>
> 
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5