| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: ZC/2-status |
Hi Thom! 27 Sep 04, Thom LaCosta wrote to Vladimir Donskoy: TL>> I'm confused....more RCs from your area wouldn't be good for you? VD>> Yes - can other RC assign another ZMH in own region? Or change VD>> nodelist flags for IP-nodes (legalize these as non-PVT nodes, VD>> analogue Zone1)? And other our problems can to resolve only ZC, not VD>> RCs! TL> Ah...it would seem then that part of the difficulty is with how the TL> current ZC of the zone you are in operates/interprets policy. Yes but position current Z2C we know over a long period (10 years) :-( . VD>> Of course if we get many RCs (more then 10) we will can to elect VD>> new Z2C, but I wrote - this is not good for other sysops Zone2! TL> It may or may not be good for other sysops in Zone2. Not be good - for example ZMH at 21-22 GMT can't be used for all Euporean sysops. Vladimir --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-040321* Origin: DVB Station (2:5020/2992) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 5020/2992 715 292/854 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.