On 2017 Jun 27 11:03:10, you wrote to me:

 ml>>>> still waiting on word back... hopefully the operator will wake up
 ml>>>> soon...

 WV>>> Are we talking about 1:123/0 here?

 ml>> no... /10... i just polled and got the same "rerror: unsecured
 ml>> session not allowed" response... the clock is ticking ;)

 WV> I meant Ed was involved in fixing this.

yeah but i'm not sure what "this" is... are you talking about resolving the
"rerror: Unsecured session not allowed" problem? if so, /10 can do that
themselves without ed needing to tell him about it... since you have email
contact with /10, you can let them know ;) then once /10 turns that option off,
direct and routed netmail can be delivered there and his NC can contact him
if/when necessary...

 WV> But I have established email contact with /10, so I could ask him to
 WV> contact Ed to resolve this?

the main thing is for /10 to turn off that forced secure sessions option so
that insecure sessions can take place for delivery of netmail from random
systems... it is especially bad if it stays turned on and his NC cannot contact
him... i would expect that the node would be removed from the nodelist after
some time of the NC being unable to contact them and this not being resolved...
tick tock tick tock tick tock...

)\/(ark

Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... I want a girl, just like the girl, that married dear old Dad! ;*)
---